• Twitter
  • linkedin
  • pinterest
Medical Healthcare Management Ltd | Hilton Hall, Essington. Wolverhampton. WV11 2BQ
menu
  • Home
  • Coding
  • Billing
  • Collections
  • Fees & FAQ
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Testimonials
    • 01
      Feb
    • (0)
    • By PeteCrutchley

    • Medical Billing News

    Insurance Company Fees – check you are charging the maximum

    A shortened version of a recent conversation with a well established private consultant surgeon.

    Very recently one of the major PMI players announced a further reduction in payable fees.

    The immediate retort from another very well established MHM client was to pass any reduction on to the patient.

    That’s all well and good but not if she is fee assured with the insurance company concerned.

    If a fee reduction is passed on to a patient by a fee assured consultant, the consultants’ recognition may be put at risk.

    We are where we are

    None of the above means MHM agrees with insurance companies reducing fees – even though market forces may on occasion be the root cause of such reduction.

    By all means, argue with the insurance company.

    And I already am.

    But don’t assume the argument fees should not be reduced will be successful.

    It might.

    There again it might not.

    Instead, make sure you are charging the very maximum you can.

    Make sure you are charging for everything you do.

    If the surgery takes twice as long as expected, request an uplift fee. If a double consultation is required, charge for a double consultation.

    It’s not as difficult as you may think it is.

    And don’t forget to do a sanity check each month.

    If you think a 20% reduction in fees is bad, consider the 100% reduction if you fail to charge an entire consultation.

    Whilst the question of where fees will go will be considered in future blogs, its important before even thinking about your fees to make absolutely sure you are charging the right fee already.

    You’d be surprised how many aren’t!!!!

    pete@medicalhealthcaremanagement.co.uk

    FOUND THIS INTERESTING? PLEASE SHARE USING ICONS BELOW:


    Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

     

    Read more →

    • 29
      Jan
    • (0)
    • By PeteCrutchley

    • Medical Billing News

    It’s cost me how much??

    A colleague called me last week. A case of “can I pick your brains for two minutes?”

    What’s the problem?

    I’m always happy to take such calls for many times I have called others with precisely the same request. My colleague was confused as to what could or could not be charged alongside a consultation fee. Specifically, the consultant surgeon she worked for was administering injections at a consultation and she thought she could not charge a consultation fee AND a fee for the injection. She thought this would be a clear case of unbundling.

    Except she was wrong.

    Her consultant was perfectly entitled to charge a separate fee for the injection.

    Damage Limitation

    A quick analysis of the outpatient consultations where my colleague had NOT charged since January 2021 revealed she had  UNDERCHARGED by a total of £837 so far this year. She had however and quite rightly charged for every single consultation – failure to do otherwise is the fastest way to lose the private consultant’s money – but had shown on her invoice the fee for the appointment alongside a ZERO fee for the injection. In the case of one single insurance company she had failed to charge in respect of 9 separate patients £450 worth of injections (9 @ £50 each)

    The bottom line is that if she undercharged injections by £837 in the first 6 months of 2021, should she continue throughout 2022 she would lose her consultant £1,674 for the entire year.

    How did I know the answer to this one? MHM has clients in the same specialism as my colleague’s consultant. Also, MHM checks fees every month with all insurance companies for the rules of what can and cannot be charged, what is bundled and what is deemed unbundled change. Plus, most importantly, applicable fees alter!

    How many of you check what the correct fee is? Not just when you set the practice up but on a regular basis?

    But I can’t help but wonder how many consultants undercharge – are you one of them but don’t realise it?

    pete@medicalhealthcaremanagement.co.uk

    FOUND THIS INTERESTING? PLEASE SHARE USING ICONS BELOW:


    Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

     

    Read more →

    • 24
      Jan
    • (0)
    • By PeteCrutchley

    • Medical Billing News

    Unbundling – charge if you are or not

     

    Take, for example, a patient who requires an injection which may be performed by a private orthopaedic surgeon at an outpatient consultation.

    Thus you raise an invoice for, as an example,  £195  [£100 for the consultation and £95 for the injection]. Please be aware for the purposes of this article the values are fictitious!

    BUT….

    Upon receipt of the invoice by the patient’s insurance company, the value is rejected; as you CAN’T charge both for a consultation and an injection on the same invoice on the same day.

    You can charge for one or the other but not both.

    So you are paid £95 for the injection only.

    What is interesting is that the immediate reaction from some consultants could well be to charge just for the injection and argue that is the right thing to do.

    Wrong solution

    That said, it has already been suggested that the alternative would be to have the patient attend an outpatient consultation on, for example, December 18th and then attend for the injection on December 21st. See the patient twice in other words.

    In such a case, the consultant CAN charge for both.

    Not sure that’s in the patient’s best interests though but if the aim is to max revenue it is certainly in the best interests of the consultant.

    I’m certainly not saying its right or wrong.

    I am saying it’s an option.

    Where it gets really tricky, is that some insurance companies WILL let you charge for a consultation and an injection at the same time.

    Others will let you charge for some injections at a consultation but not all injections. Some, as mentioned, will not allow a charge for consultation and injection regardless if they happen at the same event.

    And don’t forget not only do different insurance providers pay different rates for consultations; they also pay different rates for the injection too.

    Gets a whole lot worse when the injection is pre-authorised as the fee for a consultation is higher than that for the injection, the orthopaedic surgeon charges for the consultation only yet the insurance company is expecting an invoice for the injection.

    Confused yet?

    Unless you check each consultation and injection episode with the insurance company concerned, you will be!

    More likely you will actually undercharge at some point in time. For example: if the insurance company DOES allow a fee for consultation and injection if you charge only for one sooner or later?

    You’ll be out of pocket.

    pete@medicalhealthcaremanagement.co.uk

    FOUND THIS INTERESTING? PLEASE SHARE USING ICONS BELOW:


    Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

     

    Read more →

    • 06
      May
    • (0)
    • By PeteCrutchley

    • Medical Billing News

    Pay Attention or loose £500?

    It’s amazing how many don’t pay attention to remittance advice.

    They should.

    I downloaded remittance advice for an MHM client yesterday.

    One of them, provided by a certain insurance company, was for 11 separate invoices with a total value of £2,400.

    But the payment made against the value of the invoices was only £1,950.

    Pretty standard stuff. The difference was almost certainly excess.

    Except it wasn’t

    WRONG!

    Whilst £350 was in respect of excess, the remaining £100 had been deducted because we had charged the wrong fee.

    No, we hadn’t.

    We had charged the correct fee for the appropriate CCSD code and the insurance company had made a mistake.

    They had reduced the value of the invoice incorrectly by mistake.

    A quick call to the insurance company later and the mistake was put right.

    Next week’s payment will include the £100 incorrectly deducted.

    FIRST TIME?

    This isn’t the first time this particular insurance company has made this mistake. Indeed it is the 5th time so far this year.

    £500 deducted from an MHM client for no valid reason!

    And that’s precisely why remittance advice is not only more useful than you think and why you should check them carefully.

    They aren’t just pieces of paper your accountant wants to see every so often.

    They also aren’t just to tell you if and when an excess has been deducted.

    The purpose of remittance advice is for you to check you have been paid the right amount for your professional services.

    DON’T HAVE TO

    Obviously, you don’t have to check each one.

    If you don’t like money or getting paid the right fee, you don’t have to.

    Yes, you do.

    pete@medicalhealthcaremanagement.co.uk

    FOUND THIS INTERESTING? PLEASE SHARE USING ICONS BELOW:


    Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

     

    Read more →

    • 06
      May
    • (0)
    • By PeteCrutchley

    • Medical Billing News

    The Insurance Company is NOT Responsible

    A question, which was asked recently at a private practice seminar MHM were presenting at.

    Interestingly the question was asked by a consultant surgeon who had started his/her private practice two years earlier.

    He said excess was the responsibility of the patient’s insurance company.

    They would collect excess or shortfall amounts from the patient on his behalf.

    Sadly this is absolutely NOT the case at all.

    The consultant is responsible

    The responsibility for the collection of such items rests very squarely on the consultant himself.

    Consider excess and the cause of excess?

    When the patient obtains private medical insurance there will be an amount – excess – agreed on the policy.

    The exact amount of the excess will depend on how much the patient pays for his/her policy.

    Generally speaking the higher the premium, the lower the excess.

    It’s just like car insurance, if you agree to a £500 excess, the premium will be lower than if you only agree £100. That’s fine – until you come to make a claim on your insurance.

    Private medical insurance carries the same principles.

    So, when the patient comes to see you and you claim the cost of your services off their insurance company there could well be excess for which the patient is liable.

    The consultant is responsible for the collection.

    Not the patient’s insurance company.

    One Hell of a Shock

    The consultant who asked the question called a few days later because of this horror, he had in excess of £5,000 worth of uncollected excess in the previous two years unpaid and due to him which nobody was collecting.

    The supplementary issue, however, is why were the excess amounts allowed to build up over two years without anybody noticing?

    pete@medicalhealthcaremanagement.co.uk

     

    FOUND THIS INTERESTING? PLEASE SHARE USING ICONS BELOW:


    Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

     

    Read more →

    • 02
      Mar
    • (0)
    • By PeteCrutchley

    • Medical Billing News

    Problems with CCSD codes?

    What’s a CCSD code?

    A CCSD code is used by insurance companies to identify a medical procedure.

    An Orthopaedic surgeon, for example,  understands what a Multiple arthroscopic operation on the knee is.

    But it’s a lot to put on an invoice every time you produce one!

    CCSD Code

    Put the CCSD code W8500 on the invoice instead. It will identify that specific procedure.

    So where do you find a code?

    How to find a CCSD Code

    A CCSD code is found on the CCSD website: www.ccsd.org.uk

    The Clinical Coding and Schedule Development Group (CCSD) consists of representatives from the five major healthcare insurers – Aviva, AXA-PPP, BUPA, Vitality and Simply Health.

    The group’s main purpose is to maintain a common standard of procedure codes. The codes reflect current medical practice and are published as the CCSD Schedule.

    The various insurance companies will, therefore, recognize such codes.

    Finding a Fee

    Whilst the example W8500 above will be recognized, it does not come with a suggested fee.

    The fee payable for each code is up to the individual insurance company concerned.

    To find the correct fee for the code, the insurance company concerned should be contacted.

    When an invoice is then sent to the insurance company for payment, the code should appear on the invoice. Both the code and the fee will match that expected by the insurance company.

    If alternatively, you do NOT use CCSD codes payment will be substantially delayed if made at all!

    pete@medicalhealthcaremanagement.co.uk

    FOUND THIS INTERESTING? PLEASE SHARE USING ICONS BELOW:


    Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

     

    Read more →

    • 12
      Jan
    • (0)
    • By PeteCrutchley

    • Medical Billing News

    Change of procedure once in theatre

    Another familiar issue that came again last week.

    Consider if, during the initial consultation, you advise your patient surgery is required.

    The patient is therefore given a CCSD code equating to the surgical episode to quote to his or her insurance company. He goes away, quotes the CCSD code to his insurance company and is given a pre-authorisation code for, as an example, AB1234 by his insurance company.

    The patient then contacts your secretary and passes over the pre-auth number.

    Everybody is happy.

    Change of Plan

    But what happens if, during surgery, you realize a change of surgical procedure is necessary?

    Does it make a difference?

    Not to the patient.

    It also doesn’t make a difference to you either for you have performed the surgical procedure you deemed to be the absolutely correct procedure at the time.

    Fee Increase

    The point at which it does make a difference, however, is the fee the amended surgical procedure attracts. For example:

    The original code of AB1234 may, for example, generate a fee of £452.

    But if during surgery, a different procedure was necessary a different code will be applicable.

    For example XX4268 instead of the original procedure code of AB1234. XX4268 generates a fee of £619.00 whereas AB1234 generates £452.

    So the question: which code do you charge for?

    The XX2468 obviously.

    Now what?

    There is a step to be taken before the invoice is raised.

    The best practice is to call the insurance company and explain the situation.

    All insurance companies are very used to such calls from MHM. Some request a letter from the consultant surgeon explaining why the change was necessary.

    Some do not.

    Invoice right = Get Paid Right

    And thus MHM invoices the correct fee and you get paid the right fee.

    What happens if you do NOT make the call to the insurance company and just invoice for a different CCSD code to that authorized?

    Having never ever done that I wasn’t sure. So I called two of the major private medical insurance companies.

    Both said the same.

    Not Getting Paid.

    At best the invoice will be seriously delayed pending their request for an explanation. In the worse case, the invoice will be declined.

    pete@medicalhealthcaremanagement.co.uk

    FOUND THIS INTERESTING? PLEASE SHARE USING ICONS BELOW:


    Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

     

    Read more →

    • 06
      May
    • (0)
    • By PeteCrutchley

    • Medical Billing News

    Medical Coding – Revisited

    Image of person thinking about undercharging

     

    I’ve been asked to revisit why coding is such a big part of medical invoicing.

    It is integral because without the correct code the chances of getting paid decrease. It is unlikely if you wish to invoice electronically you will be able to invoice without a code anyway.

    Insurance companies use medical coding to identify and detail a procedure. For example, an Orthopaedic surgeon will understand precisely what a Multiple arthroscopic operation on the knee is.

    But that’s a lot to put on an invoice. Plus there may be variations on the episode.

    Instead, use the code W8500. That will specifically identify the surgery you have done.

    If you are planning to invoice electronically you won’t be able to input the whole description anyway.

    So where do you find the code?

    CCSD

    CCSD codes can be located on the CCSD website.

    www.ccsd.org.uk

    The Clinical Coding and Schedule Development Group (CCSD) consists of the five major healthcare insurers – Aviva, AXA-PPP, BUPA, Simply Health and Vitality Health.

    Its main purpose is to maintain a common standard of procedure codes. Such codes reflect current medical practice within the private healthcare sector. They are published as the CCSD Schedule of codes.

    The various insurance companies will, therefore, recognise the majority of codes.

    However, a word of caution.

    Codes & Fees

    Whilst the example above of W8500 will be recognised, a CCSD code does not come with a suggested fee rate.

    The fee rate for each code is up to the individual insurance company concerned. To find the correct fee for the code, you will need to check with that insurance company.

    For example, the W8500 mentioned earlier carries a fee of £615 for one insurance company. For a different insurance company, the fee may be £550. If you charge £550 instead of £615 by mistake, you will NOT have your fee increased.

    If however, you charge £615 when it should be £550, your fee will be reduced.

    Whilst not so important for consultations, a CCSD code is imperative IF a surgical episode is required. The patient must quote the code to his or her insurance company when pre-authorisation is being requested.

    When an invoice is sent to the insurance company, the code should appear on the invoice, This will reconcile to that expected by the insurance company.

    If alternatively, you do NOT use CCSD codes payment will be substantially delayed if made at all!

    pete@medicalhealthcaremanagement.co.uk

    FOUND THIS INTERESTING? PLEASE SHARE USING ICONS BELOW:


    Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

     

    Read more →

    • 25
      May
    • (0)
    • By Pete Crutchley

    • Medical Billing News

    CCSD Codes – where do you find them?

     

    Another question asked at the recent Medical Defence Union presentation.

    Insurance companies use medical coding to identify and detail a medical procedure. For example, an Orthopaedic surgeon will understand what a Multiple arthroscopic operation on the knee is. But that is an awful lot to put on an invoice every time. Plus there may be variations on such an episode. Rather put the code W8500 on the invoice which will specifically identify the episode.

    So where do you find the code?

    Most codes can be located on the CCSD website: www.ccsd.org.uk

    The Clinical Coding and Schedule Development Group (CCSD) consists of the five major healthcare insurers. Aviva, AXA-PPP, BUPA, Vitality and Simply Health. Its purpose is to maintain a common standard of procedure codes. Consequently,  CCSD publishes a Schedule of codes which reflect current medical practice.

    Where do you find the fee?

    However, be warned. Whilst the example above of W8500 will be recognized, a CCSD does not publish a suggested rate of remuneration. The rate payable for each code is up to the individual insurance company concerned. As a result, the surgeon has to check with the patient’s insurance company.

    A CCSD code is imperative IF a surgical episode is required. The patient will need to quote the code to his or her insurance company when pre-authorisation is being requested anyway.

    Thus when an invoice is sent to the insurance company for your fees, the code should appear on the invoice.  It will reconcile to that expected by the insurance company.

    If alternatively, you do NOT use CCSD codes payment will be substantially delayed if made at all!

    pete@medicalhealthcaremanagement.co.uk

    FOUND THIS INTERESTING? PLEASE SHARE USING ICONS BELOW:


    Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

     

    Read more →

    • 09
      Mar
    • (0)
    • By Pete Crutchley

    • Medical Billing News

    Why are my electronic invoices not going through?

     

    A question we were asked very recently. One, in fact, we are asked frequently. But what is the problem?

    You don’t have the correct details

    There are a few very simple reasons why online invoices are not being accepted. The details being submitted are incomplete and/or the details being submitted are wrong.

    MHM is a big fan of electronic invoicing. But electronic invoicing does depend totally on one item. Having the correct data. For example: if you try and invoice electronically you will need the patient’s date of birth and the patient’s postcode. If either is incorrect then you will NOT be able to invoice.

    This goes back to a consistent requirement of making sure you the details are correct.

    Where do you find the right details?

    The first and ONLY place to start is the patient’s registration form.

    If this form is not completed or there are errors, the problem will manifest itself in the fact an invoice can’t be raised electronically.

    In 2017, MHM was asked to review the billing of a large medical practice. The issue was the practice was owed significant amounts of money and could not get paid by one specific insurance company. MHM reviewed 100 invoices all of which had failed to be accepted.

    In over 60% of the cases either the patient’s, policy number was missing or date of birth was missing or the patient’s postcode was wrong.

    The practice manager responsible for this had, to resolve the problem, decreed the invoices should be sent in paper form instead. A clear case of mistakingmovement for action!

    The insurance company concerned, remember, had stated invoices should be sent electronically and ONLY electronically.

    No quick fix

    There is no such thing as a quick fix. A quick fix – such as sending invoices in paper form – often leads to more problems as it does not resolve the cause of the issue. Many insurance companies will no longer not accept paper invoices anyway so you might as well get it right up front.

    MHM suggested going forward ALL patient details were captured correctly and the data verified with NO exceptions. We then took the “old” invoices and corrected/completed the data.

    Within 4 months the average monthly cash flow into the practice had increased from around £120k a month to £260k a month.

    pete@medicalhealthcaremanagement.co.uk

    FOUND THIS INTERESTING? PLEASE SHARE USING ICONS BELOW:


    Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

     

    Read more →

    • 14
      Nov
    • (0)
    • By Pete Crutchley

    • Medical Billing News

    Using one wrong digit cost £725.00

    It actually happened too.

    Wrong code

    Consider a CCSD code for a follow up consultation = 20310. Now consider the CCSD code for an ECG = 20110.

    A consultant surgeon couldn’t understand why he was not getting paid the right values for his follow up consultations i.e. £150. Instead, he was getting either £72 from one insurance company, £96 from a second or zero a third. The reason was clear when MHM investigated.

    It was because some of the invoices for his follow-ups consultations had been coded as 20110 [ECG reporting] and not 20310 [follow up consultation]

    That one digit incorrectly quoted was making all the difference.

    Insurance companies were seeing 20110; some were querying the code when the patient hadn’t had an ECG but others were happily paying the fee for the 20110. The third insurance company did not cover 20110 ECG as part of their patient offering and thus declined to pay anything.

    When numbers were audited the average discrepancy was £65. When all numbers were in, the number of errors equaled 11. And thus the client was out of pocket by approximately £725.

    The consultant concerned was not happy, especially when his work did not require an ECG anyway. Thus one day’s analysis and the consultant now receives the right fee – because the right code and fee are being used.

    Even getting ONE digit wrong can cost £725.

    FOUND THIS INTERESTING? PLEASE SHARE USING ICONS BELOW:


    Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

     

    Read more →

    • 07
      Jun
    • (0)
    • By Pete Crutchley

    • Medical Billing News

    You have NO choice, you must use a CCSD code.

    Pulse_one way

     

    What’s a CCSD code?

    A CCSD codes is used by insurance companies to identify a medical procedure.

    An Orthopaedic surgeon, for example,  understands what a Multiple arthroscopic operation on the knee (including meniscectomy, chondroplasty, drilling or microfracture) is.

    But it’s a lot to put on an invoice every time you produce one!

    CCSD Code

    Put the CCSD code W8500 on the invoice instead. It will identify that specific procedure.

    So where do you find a code?

    How to find a CCSD Code

    A CCSD code is found on the CCSD website: www.ccsd.org.uk

    The Clinical Coding and Schedule Development Group (CCSD) consists of representatives from the five major healthcare insurers – Aviva, AXA-PPP, BUPA, Vitality and Simply Health.

    The group’s main purpose is to maintain a common standard of procedure codes. The codes reflect current medical practice and are published as the CCSD Schedule.

    The various insurance companies will, therefore, recognize such codes.

    Finding a Fee

    Whilst the example W8500 above will be recognized, it does not come with a suggested fee.

    The fee payable for each code is up to the individual insurance company concerned.

    To find the correct fee for the code, the insurance company concerned should be contacted.

    When an invoice is then sent to the insurance company for payment, the code should appear on the invoice. Both the code and the fee will match that expected by the insurance company.

    If alternatively, you do NOT use CCSD codes payment will be substantially delayed if made at all!

    pete@medicalhealthcaremanagement.co.uk

    FOUND THIS INTERESTING? PLEASE SHARE USING ICONS BELOW:


    Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

     

    Read more →

    • 04
      Sep
    • (0)
    • By Pete Crutchley

    • Medical Billing News

    What’s next for fees? Are you starting with the right question?

     

    Overworked clerical worker to identify outsourcing blog post

     

    A shortened version of a recent conversation with a well established private consultant surgeon.

    Very recently one of the major PMI players announced a further reduction in payable fees. Definitely applicable to newly recognised consultants in January 2015, the fee reduction does not apply to those recognised previously. Ot at least it didn’t.

    But it does now.

    The immediate retort from another very well established MHM client was to pass any reduction on to the patient. That’s all well and good but not if she is fee assured with the insurance company concerned. I actually checked just to be sure. Yep; if a fee reduction is passed on to a patient by a fee assured consultant, the consultants recognition may be put at risk.

    None of the above means MHM agrees with insurance companies reducing fees – even though market forces may on occasion be the root cause of such reduction. By all means argue with the insurance company. And I already am.

    But…don’t rely solely on that argument and assume the argument fees should not be reduced will be successful. It might. There again it might not.

    Instead make sure you are charging the very maximum you can. Make sure you are charging for everything you do. If the surgery takes twice as long as expected, request an uplift fee. If a double consultation is required, charge for a double consultation. Its not as difficult as you may think it is.

    And don’t forget to do a sanity check each month. If you think a 20% reduction in fees is bad, consider the 100% reduction if you fail to charge an entire consultation.

    Whilst the question of where fees will go will be considered in future blogs, its important before even thinking about your fees to make absolutely sure you are charging the right fee already. You’d be surprised how many aren’t!!!!

    FOUND THIS INTERESTING? PLEASE SHARE USING ICONS BELOW:


    Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

     

    Read more →

    • 12
      Jun
    • (0)
    • By Pete Crutchley

    • Medical Billing News

    MY ON LINE INVOICES ARE NOT BEING ACCEPTED. HOW COME?

    Image of person thinking about undercharging

     

    A question we were asked very recently. One in fact we are asked frequently!

    There are a few very simple reasons why on-line invoices are not being accepted – the details being submitted are incomplete and/or the details being submitted are wrong.

    MHM is a big fan of electronic invoicing and uses it wherever and whenever possible. But it does depend totally on one item – absolute correct data. For example: if you try and invoice electronically you will almost certainly be asked to state the patient’s date of birth and the patient’s postcode. If either is incorrect or is missing then you will NOT be able to invoice. This in fact goes back to a consistent requirement of making sure you or your secretary obtains the correct details. Let’s put this in perspective. In 2014, MHM was asked to review the billing of a large private medical practice. The issue was the practice was owed significant amounts of money and could not get paid by one specific insurance company who insisted invoices should be sent electronically. MHM reviewed 100 invoices all of which had failed to be accepted electronically. In well over 60% of the cases either the patient’s policy number was missing or date of birth was missing or the patient’s post code was missing / wrong. The practice manager responsible for this had, to resolve the problem, decreed the invoices should be sent in paper form instead. A clear case of mistaking movement for action! The insurance company concerned, remember, had stated invoices should be sent electronically and ONLY electronically.

    There is no such thing as a quick fix to this. Indeed a quick fix – such as sending invoices in paper form instead – often leads to even more problems as it does not resolve the cause of the issue.

    MHM suggested going forward ALL patient details were captured correctly and the data verified with NO exceptions. We then took the “old” invoices and corrected / completed the data.

    Within 4 months the average monthly cash flow into the practice had increased from around £120k a month to £260k a month.

    www.medicalhealthcaremanagement.co.uk

    FOUND THIS INTERESTING? PLEASE SHARE USING ICONS BELOW:


    Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

     

    Read more →

    • 31
      Mar
    • (0)
    • By PeteCrutchley

    • Medical Billing News

    UNBUNDLING – WILL BE IDENTIFIED BY THE PRIVATE MEDICAL INSURANCE COMPANY.

    MHM_Billing4

     

    Take for example, a patient who requires an injection which may be performed by a private orthopaedic surgeon at an outpatient consultation.

    Thus you raise an invoice for, as an example,  £185  [£90 for the consultation and £95 for the injection] Please be aware for the purposes of this article the values are fictitious!

    BUT….

    Upon receipt of the invoice by the patient’s insurance company, the value is rejected; as you CAN’T charge both for a consultation and an injection on the same invoice on the same day. You can charge for one or the other but not both. So you are paid £90 for the injection only. What is interesting is that the immediate reaction from some consultants could well be to charge just for the injection and argue that is the right thing to do. That said, its already been suggested that the alternative and better way would be to have the patient attend an outpatient consultation on, for example, March 10th and then attend for the injection on March 25th. See the patient twice in other words. In such case the consultant CAN charge for both.

    Not sure that’s in the patient’s best interests though but if the aim is to max revenue its certainly in the best interests of the consultant. I’m certainly not saying its right or wrong. I am saying it’s an option.

    Where it gets really tricky, is that some insurance companies WILL let you charge for a consultation and an injection at the same time. Others will let you charge for some injections at a consultation but not all injections. Some, as mentioned, will not allow a charge for consultation and injection regardless if they happen at the same event.

    And don’t forget not only do different insurance providers pay different rates for consultations; they also pay different rates for the injection too.

    Gets a whole lot worse when the injection is pre-authorised as the fee for a consultation is higher than that for the injection, the orthopaedic surgeon charges for the consultation only yet the insurance company is expecting an invoice for the injection.

    Confused yet?

    Unless you check each consultation and injection episode with the insurance company concerned, you will be! More likely you will actually undercharge at some point in time. For example: if the insurance company DOES allow a fee for consultation and injection, if you charge only for one sooner or later?

    You’ll be out of pocket.

    Feel free to drop me (Pete) an email if you’d like to learn how to avoid the perils of unbundling.

    FOUND THIS INTERESTING? PLEASE SHARE USING ICONS BELOW:


    Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

     

    Read more →

    • 10
      Mar
    • (0)
    • By Pete Crutchley

    • Medical Billing News

    Insurance company took the consultant surgeon’s fee back

    Mar 10 - Be afraid

    Some insurance companies decline to accept invoices that are sent more than six months after the consultation or surgical episode. Fair enough, they should have been invoiced.

    BUT…

    A statement was received today from a certain insurance company containing an entry reclaiming £620 paid to an MHM client in December 2013. Whilst that was before MHM started managing the client’s medical invoicing, a phone call to the insurance company was made anyway. All part of the service. 20 minutes later the insurance company concerned confirmed the payment of £620 had NOT in fact been made to the client in December 2013!

    In other words, they were totally wrong to deduct money from the MHM client. The insurance company is paying back to the MHM client the £620 at the end of the month. We’ve just saved the client £620 – result.

    Hang on a second. This particular insurance company does indeed decline invoices over six months old. Yet it makes deductions from an MHM client going back not months but years. And the deduction was wrong anyway.

    Moral of the story?

    ALWAYS check the payment remittances from an insurance company. 99% are correct but that last 1% can be worth hundred of £’s!

    How many of you have had this happen to you? More importantly how many of you realise it has happened?

    FOUND THIS INTERESTING? PLEASE SHARE USING ICONS BELOW:


    Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

     

    Read more →

    • 05
      Mar
    • (0)
    • By Pete Crutchley

    • Medical Billing News

    Self Funders / Shortfalls – Learning to write did come in useful after all

    Mar 5 - Learning to write

    Many months back a medical secretary friend of mine suggested the MHM approach of writing the address on an envelope to a self-funder or for an excess/shortfall looked unprofessional. The address should be typed in her view, presentation being everything.

    My reply was that an envelope with a typed address could easily be mistaken for some kind of circular or indeed as junk mail. She was having none of that argument and insisted her view was correct.

    Skip forward several months and we met up again. She asked how MHM were finding self-funders and excess charges and specifically were we getting them paid? In answering we stated we, like her, had seen an increase. Nonetheless we were having them paid. She apparently was seeing the same increase in numbers but significantly was seriously struggling to get them paid. Many times she called a patient to be told the invoice hadn’t arrived.

    When I mentioned writing the address again, she stopped and thought about it again.

    She called me this afternoon. Since she stopped typing the address and writing it instead, she’s seen an increase in the number of paid self-funders. She is also seeing an increase in the number of paid excess / shortfalls too.

    Learning to write did come in useful after all!

    FOUND THIS INTERESTING? PLEASE SHARE USING ICONS BELOW:


    Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

     

    Read more →

    • 23
      Jun
    • (0)
    • By Pete Crutchley

    • Medical Billing News

    Talking to an insurance company

    There are certain items that are mandatory when you call a patient’s insurance company. Such requirements are dictated by the Data Protection Act and, put simply, it’s highly unlikely without the right information you can make an enquiry regarding a patient.

    The essentials

    In the ideal world, you will have:

    The Policy Number Patients name Patient’s FULL address The POST CODE (don’t forget it) Patient’s Date of Birth Treatment date CCSD code

    The pre-authorisation number is very useful too.

    But what do you do if you don’t have the policy number? If you have the patients name, full address (inc the postcode!!) and date of birth you stand an extremely high chance of the insurance company telling you the policy number. Indeed often I’ve had to speak with an insurance company to obtain the policy number.

    With the above to hand, it’s not an issue. Use the opportunity to confirm or obtain the pre-authorisation reference as well though.

    On a parallel note, some insurance companies will only let you raise three queries per phone call with them. Some may, if they are not too busy, do more but generally speaking three is the limit.

    This despite what many think, is important for if you have say 12 to do, it’s going to take time. Especially if you are on hold for 10/15 minutes BEFORE you get through to the insurance company.

    So, the very best thing to do is to make sure the clinic list has absolutely everything you need in order to invoice correctly. That way, you won’t have to contact the insurance company first. Also of course, if there is an invoice query after you’ve billed the consultation/episode you will have all the data in front of you when you DO speak to the insurance company.

    Without it, you will struggle.

    pete@medicalhealthcaremanagement.co.uk

    FOUND THIS INTERESTING? PLEASE SHARE USING ICONS BELOW:


    Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

     

    Read more →

    • 10
      Apr
    • (0)
    • By Pete Crutchley

    • Medical Billing News

    What is medical coding anyway?

    Another question asked at a recent presentation.

    Insurance companies use medical coding to identify  a medical procedure.

    For example, an Orthopaedic surgeon understands what a Multiple arthroscopic operation is. But that is a lot to put on an invoice.  Rather put the code W8500 on the invoice. That will specifically identify the episode.

    So where do you find the code?

    Most codes can be located on the CCSD website: www.ccsd.org.uk

    The Clinical Coding and Schedule Development Group (CCSD) consists of the five major healthcare insurers. Its purpose is to maintain a common standard of procedure codes. Consequently,  CCSD publishes a Schedule of codes which reflect current medical practice.

    Where do you find the fee?

    However, be warned. Whilst the example above of W8500 will be recognized, CCSD does not publish a suggested fee. The rate payable for each code is up to the individual insurance companies. As a result, the surgeon has to check with each one.

    A CCSD code is imperative IF a surgical episode is required. The patient will need to quote the code to his  insurance company when pre-authorisation is being requested anyway.

    Thus when an invoice is sent to the insurance company, the code should appear on the invoice.  It will reconcile to that expected by the insurance company.

    If alternatively, you do NOT use CCSD codes payment will be substantially delayed if made at all!

    pete@medicalhealthcaremanagement.co.uk

    FOUND THIS INTERESTING? PLEASE SHARE USING ICONS BELOW:


    Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather

     

    Read more →

© Copyright 2020 - MHM Ltd - Website Terms - Privacy Policy - Cookies Policy

Healthcare and medical web development

MHM Ltd Cookies Policy

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. Please visit our Cookies Policy page for more information about cookies and how we use them.

Close